Howard v. State
Howard v. State
627 So. 2d 605; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502; 1993 WL 504593
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Howard v. State
Opinion of the Court
The denial of the defendant’s motion for belated appeal is affirmed without prejudice to a timely, successive motion for belated appeal containing the necessary allegations under oath. See Gilliam v. State, 611 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.