Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Woods v. State

Woods v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 23, 1993 · Cobb, Peterson, Sharp
627 So. 2d 1343; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12622; 1993 WL 535982 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Woods v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Woods argues on appeal he is entitled to have his five year sentence followed by five years probation for unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance1 specify that he is entitled to 335 days credit. We agree the sentence should reflect the 335 day credit and remand this cause to the trial court for correction. However, this correction will not foreclose the Department of Corrections from forfeiting the gain time earned because of Woods’ violation of probation and subtraet-ing it from the 335 days of credit, pursuant to section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes (1991).

REMANDED to Correct Sentence.

COBB, W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

. § 893.13(1)(a)(1), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.