Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1993

Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware

Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 7, 1993 · Booth, Joanos, Zehmer
630 So. 2d 604; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13050; 1993 WL 499247 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The Judge of Compensation Claims has certified that the tape recording of the final hearing is inaudible and therefore, a record cannot be reconstructed. Remand for a new hearing has been requested and no party has filed an objection. Accordingly, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded *605for a new hearing. Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑