Davidson v. State
Davidson v. State
638 So. 2d 626; 1994 WL 316290
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Moss v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Rolle v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Lindel Ray DAVIDSON, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Lindel Ray Davidson, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
As the purported recantation testimony is neither sworn nor particularized, and there is no showing how (if at all) the claimed recantation would have affected the trial, the trial court was entirely correct in denying the motion for postconviction relief as facially insufficient.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.