Payne v. State
Payne v. State
630 So. 2d 235; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 434; 1994 WL 26998
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Payne v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. We conclude that the self-incriminating statements which defendant made freely and voluntarily after being given his Miranda rights were properly admitted in evidence. Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564, 107 S.Ct. 851, 93 L.Ed.2d 954 (1987). We also conclude that the prosecutor’s comment was not an impermissible comment on defendant’s right to remain silent, but was rather a proper comment on the above-mentioned pretrial statements.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.