Wells v. State
Wells v. State
630 So. 2d 1215; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 195; 1994 WL 12240
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wells v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s judgments and sentences which were imposed following his pleas of guilty; however, we modify the sentencing orders relative to appellant’s three convictions for attempted forgery, a misdemeanor, to delete the habitual offender designation for these offenses because a misdemeanor conviction “is not subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute.” Brown v. State, 626 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993):
AFFIRMED as modified.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.