Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Wells v. State

Wells v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 21, 1994 · Cobb, Dauksch, Diamantis
630 So. 2d 1215; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 195; 1994 WL 12240 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wells v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgments and sentences which were imposed following his pleas of guilty; however, we modify the sentencing orders relative to appellant’s three convictions for attempted forgery, a misdemeanor, to delete the habitual offender designation for these offenses because a misdemeanor conviction “is not subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute.” Brown v. State, 626 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993):

AFFIRMED as modified.

DAUKSCH, COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.