Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Fontainebleau Hilton v. Baldomino

Fontainebleau Hilton v. Baldomino
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 7, 1994 · Mickle, Miner, Smith
630 So. 2d 1257; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 600; 1994 WL 30332 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Fontainebleau Hilton v. Baldomino

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The employer and the servicing agent appeal from the judge of compensation claims’ final order that 1) included the claimant’s concurrent employment in the calculation of average weekly wage (AWW) and 2) awarded temporary partial disability benefits beyond a certain date. We affirm. The determination of AWW is supported by our recent en banc decision in Vegas v. Globe Security, 627 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). See also Nowak v. YMCA South County, 629 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). On the second issue, we find competent substantial evidence in the record to support the award of benefits based on wage-request forms covering the entire period of the award.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.