Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

E.V.V. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 8, 1994 · No. 93-1542 · Cope, Gersten, Goderich

631 So. 2d 359; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 760; 1994 WL 34078 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

E.V.V. appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent for theft. We conclude (a) that there was no violation of the best evidence rule, § 90.952, Fla.Stat. (1991); (b) that there was no abuse of discretion with respect to the Richardson1 hearing; (c) that there was no Brady2 violation, see Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d *360281 (1988); and (d) that the motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied.

Affirmed.

. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971).

. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.