Schaller v. KMart Corp.

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Schaller v. KMart Corp., 631 So. 2d 380 (1994)
1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1004; 1994 WL 45111
Cope, Gersten, Goderich

Schaller v. KMart Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Sandra Joan Schaller, plaintiff below, appeals the denial of her motion for new trial, asserting that the damages awarded to her were inadequate. A motion for new trial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. White v. Martinez, 359 So.2d 7, 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). After careful consideration of plaintiffs arguments, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of the new trial motion. See Griffis v. Hill, 230 So.2d 143, 145 (Fla. 1969). This ruling moots the cross-appeal.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sandra Joan SCHALLER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. KMART CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published