Smith v. State
Smith v. State
632 So. 2d 99; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1023; 1994 WL 28849
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for burglary of a conveyance. However, our review of the record reveals that the defendant was never apprised of his right to contest the amount of the public defender’s lien that was imposed. This was error. Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638, 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Therefore, the $600 lien is stricken without prejudice to its reim-position upon compliance with Rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with.this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.