Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Allen v. State

Allen v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 4, 1994 · Cobb, Dauksch, Griffin
632 So. 2d 712; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1832; 1994 WL 63309 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Allen v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting.

Because the trial judge did not find the traffic stop to be pretextual it is very difficult for me to so determine. But it is obvious that the only reason the drug enforcement deputies stopped the car was to search the car. I’ve viewed the deputies’ own videotapes of the incident to reach my decision that this was an unconstitutional intrusion *713upon the liberties of the appellant and his codefendants. I would order the evidence suppressed. The judgment has a typographical error and the court improperly assessed “100FDLE” and “$15 drug and alcohol” costs. For these additional reasons I would reverse/

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.