Gunter v. State
Gunter v. State
633 So. 2d 127; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3012; 1994 WL 90372
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gunter v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I believe the trial court erred in allowing the state to extensively question the appellant about the nature of his prior convictions. I do not believe that appellant opened the door to this questioning by denying that he smoked crack cocaine. Further, because the case was essentially a one-on-one between the appellant and an undercover officer who testified he purchased a cocaine rock from appellant, I cannot find the error harmless.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.