Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Lloyd v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 31, 1994 · No. 93-392 · Dauksch, Griffin, Peterson

633 So. 2d 1205; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3067; 1994 WL 107206 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Baker v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Conn v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Judge.

After violating his probation, Lloyd was sentenced at one sentencing hearing on both the original offense (lower court case number 91-11437) and on the new substantive offenses which constituted the violation (lower court case number 92-7140). In case number 91-11437, Lloyd received a departure sentence in excess of the one-cell bump-up permitted by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll). The trial court could have *1206departed from the guidelines for reasons that existed as of the original sentencing hearing; 1 however, the departure sentence imposed here was invalid because it was not supported by contemporaneous written reasons and the record does not indicate that Lloyd agreed to be sentenced outside the guidelines as part of his plea. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990); Rice v. State, 622 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). We thus vacate Lloyd’s sentence in case number 91-11437 and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

We ñnd no merit in Lloyd’s second claim that the lower court committed reversible error in excluding a juror for cause in case no. 92-7140.

JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

. Snead v. State, 616 So.2d 964 (Fla. 1993); Williams v. State, 581 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1991).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.