Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

State v. Dunsford

State v. Dunsford
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 7, 1994 · Davis, Ervin, Mickle
634 So. 2d 319; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3291; 1994 WL 113623 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Dunsford

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the information. Under Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), there was no double jeopardy violation.1

REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings.

ERVIN, MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

. We acknowledge that United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 2849, 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), which changed the law in this area, had not been issued at the time the trial court decided the case at bar and relied on the Court’s earlier contradictory decision in Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 110 S.Ct. 2084, 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.