Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

R.H. v. State

R.H. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 7, 1994 · Allen, Booth, Webster
634 So. 2d 321; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3289; 1994 WL 113632 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

R.H. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the trial court requiring appellant’s employer to deduct $31 per month from appellant’s pay to satisfy a prior order of restitution. We must reverse because there is no statutory or rule authority permitting the trial court to impose income deduction as part of restitution in juvenile cases. See § 39.058, Fla.Stat. (1991); § 39.054, Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1992); contrast § 775.089(12)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1992).

BOOTH, ALLEN, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.