Terry v. State
Terry v. State
634 So. 2d 660; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 685; 1994 WL 34070
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Terry v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s convictions, except we reverse the imposition of the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. Because appellant’s offenses occurred during a single criminal episode, consecutive minimum mandatory sentences were improper. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla. 1992). Accordingly, we reverse only the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences and remand for resen-tencing in accordance with this opinion.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.