Terry v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Terry v. State, 634 So. 2d 660 (1994)
1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 685; 1994 WL 34070
Gunther, Juan, Ramirez, Stone

Terry v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions, except we reverse the imposition of the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. Because appellant’s offenses occurred during a single criminal episode, consecutive minimum mandatory sentences were improper. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla. 1992). Accordingly, we reverse only the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences and remand for resen-tencing in accordance with this opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and RAMIREZ, JUAN, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ronald Eugene TERRY v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published