Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Munch v. State

Munch v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 4, 1994 · Cobb, Diamantes, Peterson
634 So. 2d 679; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1822; 1994 WL 63295 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Munch v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s conviction for armed robbery is affirmed. However, as the state concedes, the trial court erred in failing to award the defendant credit for time served in jail prior to sentencing. See § 921.161, Fla. Stat. The defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for computation of jail time credit. See Arnette v. State, 593 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

*680CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; AND CAUSE REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑