Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Smallwood v. State

Smallwood v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 6, 1994 · Altenbernd, Campbell, Danahy
634 So. 2d 1109; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3250; 1994 WL 114697 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Smallwood v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions in this case. We affirm the sentences except for the following matters. We strike special condition of probation number 6 because it was not announced at sentencing. We instruct that the order of probation be corrected to reflect that the defendant was found guilty by the verdict of a jury. We reverse the order setting the amount of restitution because it was entered after the notice of appeal was filed. Skaggs v. State, 620 So.2d 1304 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the amount of restitution because it had reserved jurisdiction to do so. Id. See also State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1993) (holding that if order of restitution has been entered in timely manner, the court can determine the amount of restitution beyond the sixty-day period).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.