Freundlich v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Freundlich v. State, 636 So. 2d 590 (1994)
1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590; 1994 WL 182731
Cobb, Goshorn, Sharp

Freundlich v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court allowed two proffered hearsay statements of the child-victim to be used at Freundlich’s sexual battery trial, plus the child’s own testimony, there is no apparent reversible error demonstrated. Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665 (Fla. 1992). Compliance with the requirements of section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes, was satisfactory in this case. See State v. Townsend, 635 So.2d 949 (Fla. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mark FREUNDLICH v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published