Freundlich v. State
Freundlich v. State
636 So. 2d 590; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590; 1994 WL 182731
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Freundlich v. State
Opinion of the Court
Although the trial court allowed two proffered hearsay statements of the child-victim to be used at Freundlich’s sexual battery trial, plus the child’s own testimony, there is no apparent reversible error demonstrated. Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665 (Fla. 1992). Compliance with the requirements of section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes, was satisfactory in this case. See State v. Townsend, 635 So.2d 949 (Fla. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.