Tareena, Inc. v. Toomey
Tareena, Inc. v. Toomey
636 So. 2d 758; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2757; 1994 WL 81775
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Tareena, Inc. v. Toomey
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. The hearing below was premature. See Muckenfuss v. Deltona Corp., 508 So.2d 340, 341 (Fla. 1987); Wood v. Price, 546 So.2d 88, 90 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 553 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 1989). I would remand for a new hearing on a complete record.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.