Vereen v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Vereen v. State, 637 So. 2d 386 (1994)
1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671; 1994 WL 248272
Griffin, Peterson, Thompson

Vereen v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to resubmit the Rule 3.850 motion with the proper oath. See Van Tassell v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).1

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

. We note that the order denying the 3.850 motion is also insufficient. A copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that Vereen is entitled to no relief is not attached to the order as required by Rule 3.850(d).

Reference

Full Case Name
Grayling L. VEREEN v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published