Love v. State
Love v. State
637 So. 2d 388; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5867; 1994 WL 256881
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Love v. State
Opinion of the Court
James Roy Love appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The state has apparently conceded that the motion was facially sufficient and suggests remand to the trial court for attachment of portions of the record conclusively demonstrating that Love is not entitled to relief, or for an evidentiary hearing on his motion.
REVERSED and REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.