Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Cooper v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 21, 1994 · Levy, Nesbitt, Schwartz

638 So. 2d 200; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149; 1994 WL 275832 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Gillis v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Johnson v. State (Fla. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

No reversible error has been demonstrated in the trial proceedings which culminated *201in the convictions entered below. Specifically, we find no deficiency in the standard Miranda rights form utilized by the Metro-Dade Police Department, see California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981), and that, in the light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, any arguable error in the admission of evidence or the argument of the prosecutor was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). We do agree that the formal judgments entered against the defendants should be corrected to reflect that the charges contained in count V were dismissed on motion of the state.

Affirmed as modified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.