Kopko v. State
Kopko v. State
Opinion of the Court
Following remand by this court,
We have no alternative but to vacate the sentence appealed and remand for resentenc-ing pursuant to the guidelines. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990); Wright v. State, 617 So.2d 837, 840-41 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see Rivero v. State, 592 So.2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Rodwell v. State, 588 So.2d 19 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), review denied, 599 So.2d 657 (1992).
Sentence VACATED; REMANDED.
. Kopko v. State, 577 So.2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), quashed, 596 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1992).
. § 800.04, Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1986).
.§ 794.011(2), Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1986).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Martin David KOPKO v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published