Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Hammer v. Hammer

Hammer v. Hammer
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 6, 1994 · Farmer, Pariente, Polen
638 So. 2d 631; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681; 1994 WL 316687 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hammer v. Hammer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Based on the concession of appellee, we grant the stipulated motion to expedite this case, reverse the sanction order and those portions of the consequent final judgment affected thereby, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings. Both parties having filed motions for appellate attorney’s fees, we direct the trial court to determine in connection with its resolution of the other contested issues both entitlement and amount, if any, as to both motions.

POLEN, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.