Bain v. Hill
Bain v. Hill
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order admitting a will to probate after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
The conclusion below that the testator signed at the “end” of his will, § 732.-502(l)(a)l, Fla.Stat. (1993),
[T]here can be no fraud when [as in the present case] all parties sit at the same table and affix their signatures in the presence of each other regardless of who signs first.
Waldrep, 195 S.E.2d at 435; accord In re Estate of Lee, 225 Cal.App.2d 578, 37 Cal.Rptr. 572 (1964); Conway v. Conway, 14 Ill.2d 461, 153 N.E.2d 11 (1958); Hopson v. Ewing, 353 S.W.2d 203 (Ky.App. 1961); Wilkinson v. White, 8 Utah 2d 336, 334 P.2d 564 (1959).
Affirmed.
. Execution of wills. — Every will must be in writing and executed as follows:
(l)(a) Testator’s signature.—
1. The testator must sign the will at the end; or
2. The testator’s name must be subscribed at the end of the will by some other person in the testator’s presence and by his direction.
(b) Witnesses. — The testator's:
1. Signing, or
2. Acknowledgment:
a. That he has previously signed the will, or
b. That another person has subscribed the testator's name to it,
must be in the presence of at least two attesting witnesses.
(c) Witnesses’ signatures. — The attesting witnesses must sign the will in the presence of the testator and in the presence of each other....
§ 732.502, Fla.Stat. (1993).
. Ibid.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.