Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Amaya v. State

Amaya v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 17, 1994 · Anstead, Klein, Pariente
641 So. 2d 466; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101; 1994 WL 440577 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Amaya v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for a new trial because of the trial court’s error in refusing appellant access to counsel during an overnight recess at trial. We reject appellant’s claims that the trial court erred in denying motions to dismiss and for directed verdict.

The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in refusing appellant access to counsel. See Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 96 S.Ct. 1330, 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Bova v. State, 410 So.2d 1343 (Fla. 1982). Further, we are unable to determine that the error was harmless under the strict test set out in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).

ANSTEAD, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.