Firestone v. Hinds
Firestone v. Hinds
641 So. 2d 514; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8476; 1994 WL 463508
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Firestone v. Hinds
Opinion of the Court
We conclude that the record contains competent substantial evidence to support the order of the judge of compensation claims.
AFFIRMED.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Because I believe the claimant failed to establish by expert testimony a causal con-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.