Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Primm v. State

Primm v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 17, 1994 · Glickstein, Polen, Stevenson
641 So. 2d 930; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8105; 1994 WL 440574 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Primm v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find appellant’s Notice of Appeal to be timely filed pursuant to Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1992).

Having considered appellant’s brief and the record, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s criminal rule 3.850 motion without evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑