Gonsoulin v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Gonsoulin v. State, 642 So. 2d 146 (1994)
1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8869; 1994 WL 501297
Cobb, Diamantis, Sharp

Gonsoulin v. State

Opinion of the Court

COBB, Judge.

The issue posed by this appeal is whether the crime of carrying a concealed weapon is a necessarily lesser included offense of the crime of carrying a concealed firearm. The trial court refused to so instruct the jury and the appellant contends that this was error per se.

We agree with the trial judge based upon a Blockburger analysis1 of the two offenses. By statutory definition the term “weapon” as used in section 790.01(1), Florida Statutes, excludes a firearm; therefore, the elements of the lesser offense (carrying a concealed weapon) are not encompassed by proof of the greater offense (carrying a concealed firearm). Based on the statutory language, the two offenses are mutually exclusive. See State v. Wimberly, 498 So.2d 929 (Fla. 1986).

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

. Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932).

Reference

Full Case Name
Mark GONSOULIN v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published