Selig v. Sandler
Selig v. Sandler
642 So. 2d 766; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7413; 1994 WL 386492
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Selig v. Sandler
Opinion of the Court
We must affirm the trial court’s orders granting the defendants’ motions to strike the complaint as a sham pleading where appellant has failed to provide this court with a transcript of the evidentiary hearing or a proper substitute. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). The record presented to this court by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Id.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.