Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Hessler v. T & N, PLC

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 5, 1994 · Levy, Nesbitt, Schwartz

642 So. 2d 851; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9498; 1994 WL 535086 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to demonstrate error or abuse of discretion in (a) the trial court’s exclusion of proposed rebuttal testimony, see Rhodes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 528 So.2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), or (b) any ruling as to the elements of the plaintiff’s strict liability claim. See Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir. 1985).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.