Hill v. State
Hill v. State
642 So. 2d 1206; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9561; 1994 WL 540679
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hill v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s first conviction of direct criminal contempt is AFFIRMED, but his second conviction is REVERSED because the trial court failed to strictly comply with the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. See Hernandez v. State, 397 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 382 (Fla. 1981). See also O’Neal v. State, 501 So.2d 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.