Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Sexton v. State

Sexton v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 28, 1994 · Danahy, Parker, Patterson
643 So. 2d 53; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9309; 1994 WL 523426 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Sexton v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s order compelling him to provide reciprocal discovery of matters pertaining to the penalty phase of this capital case. He essentially contends that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220 does not apply to the penalty phase of a trial. We disagree and concur with our sister court’s holding in Booker v. State, 634 So.2d 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Petition denied.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.