Thompson v. State
Thompson v. State
643 So. 2d 110; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618; 1994 WL 543102
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Thompson v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court’s order granting in part and denying in part the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed. We note, however, that the trial court’s order incorrectly provides that the sentence in 88-15445 runs consecutive to the sentences in 89-20911 and 89-20913. The written plea agreements and sentences attached to the order reflect that all sentences are to run concurrent with each other.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.