Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Dilbert v. State

Dilbert v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 9, 1994 · Danahy, Parker, Patterson
644 So. 2d 354; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10820; 1994 WL 636450 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dilbert v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s motion for a “proposed order to clarify sentence” is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant seeking relief with respect to gain time by filing either a petition for writ of habeas corpus or mandamus. See Searcy v. Singletary, 590 So.2d 1034 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Hall v. *355Wainwright, 498 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑