Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Rangel v. State

Rangel v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 18, 1994 · Mickle, Webster, Wolf
644 So. 2d 616; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162; 1994 WL 645475 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rangel v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The motion filed in the trial court by appellant, pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, was not properly verified under oath. Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla. 1986); Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient. Therefore, the order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.