Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Frazier v. State

Frazier v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 18, 1994 · Diamantis, Harris, Peterson
645 So. 2d 572; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11154; 1994 WL 645788 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Frazier v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the habitual offender sentence imposed in this case and remand this cause for resentencing. See Santoro v. State, 644 So.2d 585 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Thompson v. State, 638 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Cole v. State, 640 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We also vacate the Public Defender’s lien imposed in this case because the trial court failed to comply with rule 3.720(d)(1) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Craig v. State, 643 So.2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). In resentencing on remand, the trial court shall comply with rule 3.720(d)(1) before assessing a Public Defender’s lien.

Sentence VACATED; cause REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.