Cratsley v. State
Cratsley v. State
645 So. 2d 1058; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11345; 1994 WL 637700
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cratsley v. State
Opinion of the Court
Barry Cratsley challenges the revocation of his probation in case nos. 89-5191, 89-6111, and 90-6037. He contends that his guilty plea was not freely and voluntarily entered.
In order for the issue of the voluntariness of a plea to be considered on direct appeal, a defendant must have filed a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court. Thomas v. State, 442 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cratsley did not do so.
Accordingly, we affirm Cratsley’s judgments and sentences in the aforementioned cases without prejudice to his filing a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.