Maldonado v. State
Maldonado v. State
646 So. 2d 852; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12586; 1994 WL 715206
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Maldonado v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the appellant’s convictions for armed robbery, armed burglary, and armed kidnapping, see Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla. 1980); State v. Freber, 366 So.2d 426 (Fla. 1978); Scott v. State, 629 So.2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), but, as the state concedes, we find error in sentencing the appellant as an habitual offender. See Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1992). Therefore, we vacate the sentences and return the matter to the trial court for resentencing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.