Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Maldonado v. State

Maldonado v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 28, 1994 · Barkdull, Cope, Goderich
646 So. 2d 852; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12586; 1994 WL 715206 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Maldonado v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions for armed robbery, armed burglary, and armed kidnapping, see Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla. 1980); State v. Freber, 366 So.2d 426 (Fla. 1978); Scott v. State, 629 So.2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), but, as the state concedes, we find error in sentencing the appellant as an habitual offender. See Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1992). Therefore, we vacate the sentences and return the matter to the trial court for resentencing.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.