Beatty v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Beatty v. State, 647 So. 2d 261 (1994)
1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11391; 1994 WL 664101
Allen, Benton, Lawrence

Beatty v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850 motion for post-conviction relief is facially deficient, in that it does not contain all of the information required by rule 3.850(c). See, e.g., Schofield v. State, 641 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The order denying relief is therefore affirmed.

ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
John BEATTY v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published