Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Beatty v. State

Beatty v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 29, 1994 · Allen, Benton, Lawrence
647 So. 2d 261; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11391; 1994 WL 664101 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Beatty v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850 motion for post-conviction relief is facially deficient, in that it does not contain all of the information required by rule 3.850(c). See, e.g., Schofield v. State, 641 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The order denying relief is therefore affirmed.

ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.