Haynes v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal November 23, 1994

Haynes v. State, 647 So. 2d 904 (1994)

1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11370; 1994 WL 655887

Barr, Gunther, Robbie, Stevenson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects except one. The State concedes the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for count I and count III. Therefore, sentences for count I and III should run concurrently.

Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences, except for the State’s concession of sentencing error and remand to the trial court.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., and BARR, ROBBIE M., Associate Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Antoneeze HAYNES v. STATE of Florida
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published