Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1994

Haynes v. State

Haynes v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 23, 1994 · Barr, Gunther, Robbie, Stevenson
647 So. 2d 904; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11370; 1994 WL 655887 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Haynes v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects except one. The State concedes the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for count I and count III. Therefore, sentences for count I and III should run concurrently.

Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences, except for the State’s concession of sentencing error and remand to the trial court.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., and BARR, ROBBIE M., Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑