Coley v. State
Coley v. State
648 So. 2d 165; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10749; 1994 WL 617083
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Coley v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm defendant’s conviction. Any error in excluding evidence during the cross examination of the witness Jordan was harmless. There was no error in the court’s limitation of the cross examination of the medical examiner.
As to the sentence, upon the state’s concession of error, we strike the restitution order as well as the condition of probation relating to restitution. As corrected, the sentence is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.