Gene B. Glick Company, Inc. v. Sunshine Ready Concrete Company, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- TIMOTHY D MURPHY v. JOHN J PANKAUSKI (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
- Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2015)
- Hardin v. Oakley Transport Inc. (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2025)
- RHYTHM & HUES, LLC v. NATURE'S LAWN CARE, INC. d/b/a NATURE'S LANDSCAPING (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
- SUZMAR, LLC v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH MIAMI (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
- Goldhoff v. Saunders (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2023)
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. At Home Auto Glass LLC (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2022)
- Commercial Repairs and Sales, LLC v. Signet Jewelers Limited (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2019)
- Real Estate Value Co. v. Carnival Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
- Della Ratta v. Della Ratta (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Behm v. Cape Lumber Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
- General Electric Co. v. Latin American Imports, S.A. (District Court, W.D. Kentucky 2002)
- NGL Travel Assoc. v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- In re Paxson Electric Co. (United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida 2000)
- Commerce v. Equity (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC., CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and BACK BAY APARTMENTS, Appellants,
v.
SUNSHINE READY CONCRETE COMPANY, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Larry A. Karns, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Thomas D. Daiello of Marchbanks, Daiello & Leider, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court in all respects except we reverse as to that portion of the final judgment in favor of the appellee, Sunshine Ready Concrete Co., against the appellant, Back Bay Apartments for unjust enrichment.
Unjust enrichment is equitable in nature and cannot exist where payment has been made for the benefit conferred. Back Bay paid Glick Company the full amount of its contract for the construction project. Accordingly, there can be no unjust enrichment to support Sunshine's claim.
GUNTHER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.