Wise v. Schmidek
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision.
- Riverland and Indian Sun v. Lj Melody (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- In re Estate of Barsanti (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- City of Miami Beach v. Kuoni Destination Management, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
- Ripoll v. Comprehensive Personal Care Services, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
- Drew Johnson v. Dunya Navabi (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- Credo LLC v. Speyside Investments Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- State Investment Holding, Inc. v. Merrick Partnership, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
- Reed v. Giles (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
- Lennar Homes, LLC v. v. VENTURES, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
- NRD Investments, Inc. v. Velazquez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
- Berger v. Cohen (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
- Cohen Financial, Lp v. kmc/ec II, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
- Jackson v. Echols (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Elias v. Steele (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Miguez v. Miguez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
- Rollins, Inc. v. Parker (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Vargas v. Vargas (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Millennium Communications & Fulfillment, Inc. v. Office of Atty. Gen. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Anich Industries, Inc. v. Raney (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Simonik v. Patterson (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Corporate Relations Group, Inc. v. Bradach (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Gomez v. Riteway Insurance Repair Service, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- System One Information Management, L.L.C. v. Incentive Connection Travel, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
- U.S. 1 Office Corp. v. Falls Home Furnishings, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
- Courey International (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Fleming (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Stella WISE and Martin Goldman, Appellants,
v.
Ian SCHMIDEK, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Ruden Barnett McCloskey Smith Schuster & Russell and Norman A. Fleisher and James George, Miami, for appellants.
*337 Steel Hector & Davis and Clay Craig and Brian J. Felcoski, Miami, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, COPE and GREEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants appeal the entry of an ex parte, temporary injunction freezing certain trust assets pending the outcome of this probate proceeding. We affirm.
Generally speaking, the trial court may exercise broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, this court will not disturb the trial court's decision. Sanchez v. Solomon, 508 So.2d 1264, 1265 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Moreover, we have said that a circuit court, sitting in its probate capacity, has inherent jurisdiction to monitor the administration of an estate and to take such appropriate action as it may deem necessary to preserve the assets of the estate for the benefit of the ultimate beneficiaries. Estate of Conger, 414 So.2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Based upon our review of the record before us, we do not find that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the temporary injunction on an ex parte basis.
Accordingly, we affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.