Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Borakove v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
- Rollins v. Bay HR, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
- Hogg v. ARENA SPORTS CAFE (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
- Pedersen v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
- Benson v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- Swain v. Department of Children & Families (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
- Fryburg v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
- Loss Prevention Specialists, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Panzer v. Personnel One, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Williams v. National School of Technology, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Richards v. Nations Bank, NA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Deak v. Deak (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- Negron v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- Bachelor v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Virginia WOLFSON, Appellant,
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Virginia L. Wolfson, pro se.
Geri Atkinson-Hazelton and John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Com'n.
No appearance for appellee Kelly Services, Inc.
W. SHARP, Judge.
Wolfson appeals from a final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which affirmed the appeals referee's ruling that she is not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. The appellant has the burden in these cases to demonstrate error and where the thrust of the argument is fact findings made by the referee, the appellant's failure to include a copy of the transcript, as part of the record on appeal, is fatal. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). The referee found that Wolfson left her employment in order to assist her daughter in Chicago, and not for "good cause attributable to his employing unit."[1] Accordingly we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.