Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 10, 1995 · W. Sharp
649 So. 2d 363; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1187; 1995 WL 51119 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

649 So.2d 363 (1995)

Virginia WOLFSON, Appellant,
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.

No. 94-1408.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

February 10, 1995.

Virginia L. Wolfson, pro se.

Geri Atkinson-Hazelton and John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Com'n.

No appearance for appellee Kelly Services, Inc.

W. SHARP, Judge.

Wolfson appeals from a final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which affirmed the appeals referee's ruling that she is not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. The appellant has the burden in these cases to demonstrate error and where the thrust of the argument is fact findings made by the referee, the appellant's failure to include a copy of the transcript, as part of the record on appeal, is fatal. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). The referee found that Wolfson left her employment in order to assist her daughter in Chicago, and not for "good cause attributable to his employing unit."[1] Accordingly we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] § 443.101(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.