Venero v. State
Venero v. State
647 So. 2d 1077; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 30; 1995 WL 1716
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Venero v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court properly denied defendant Mario Venero’s attempt to exercise a peremptory challenge against a prospective juror. The record supports the court’s finding that the challenge was improperly motivated by either gender or race. Abshire v. State, 642 So.2d 542 (Fla. 1994); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). Therefore, Venero’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.