Milner v. State
Milner v. State
649 So. 2d 355; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 978; 1995 WL 46623
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm, but remand so that appellant’s sentences can be corrected to reflect that the sentence on Count III is to be served concurrently with the sentence on Count I, but not concurrently with the sentence on Count II.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.