Grant v. State
Grant v. State
650 So. 2d 705; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971; 1995 WL 79905
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Grant v. State
Opinion of the Court
As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a ten year mandatory minimum provision on the defendant’s thirty year sentence, when he was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, not a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). Therefore, the ten year mandatory provision is reversed. The remaining arguments raised by the defendant lack merit.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.