Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1995

Grant v. State

Grant v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 1, 1995 · Barkdull, Goderich, Levy
650 So. 2d 705; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971; 1995 WL 79905 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Grant v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a ten year mandatory minimum provision on the defendant’s thirty year sentence, when he was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, not a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). Therefore, the ten year mandatory provision is reversed. The remaining arguments raised by the defendant lack merit.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.