Heretick v. State
Heretick v. State
650 So. 2d 708; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1990; 1995 WL 80038
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Heretick v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction of false imprisonment but reverse his conviction for battery on the authority of Blanchard v. State, 634 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 641 So.2d 1344 (Fla. 1994), and Chaeld v. State, 599 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
We find no error in the denial of the motion to suppress. See Owen v. State, 560 So.2d 207 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S: 855, 111 S.Ct. 152, 112 L.Ed.2d 118 (1990).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded to discharge the appellant as to the conviction for battery.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.